Andrei's list of barriers to D adoption

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 16:12:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
>
> If you compare current day D to C++ it only have two advantage 
> points:
>
> - static if
>
> - a naive garbage collector
>
> But D lambdas are worse, floats are worse, ints are worse, simd 
> support is worse (gcc/clang) and documentation is worse.
>

How about no headers or macros? Dub? Chaining range operations 
with ufcs?