The Problem With DIPs

[Seb via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 10:38:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 6/10/16 9:00 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2016-06-09 23:34, Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> That doesn't stop anyone from commenting on them, offering 
>>> improvements,
>>> doing some promotion of them, organizing handling them, etc.
>>
>> If feel that's a bit pointless if no one with some form of 
>> authority
>> will look at it.
>
> It's much better than making informal remarks on the forum, 
> which then scroll out of memory. I encourage people who have 
> good ideas and are willing and able to take them to completion 
> to formulate them as DIPs. Good quality DIPs will eventually 
> get discussed more often and end up being implemented. -- Andrei

+1

It's all about working more collaboratively - I believe Dicebot 
will do an amazing job as review manager!

If you read his proposed procedure at the WIP-repo 
(https://github.com/Dicebot/DIPs), it's about collecting 
high-quality DIPs in "Drafts" that are then "brought to the 
language authors for review".