I'd love to see DScript one day ...

[Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 12 June 2016 at 12:05:49 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> Conformance would be more important so that you can
> use libraries and compilers that compile to EcmaScript.

That's kinda the problem with dmdscript: it is an excellent and 
conformant implementation of Javascript that performed better 
than its competitors... many years ago.

The standard has moved on, the bar on performance has raised, and 
dmdscript hasn't even kept up with changes in D.

It's still a very good implementation of ECMAScript 3, and with a 
bit of D stuff, interfacing with it is reasonably easy, but tbh 
it just isn't something I'd use anymore... my script.d is easier 
to build and interface for quick toys, and one of the newer JS 
engines is better at Javascript itself.