I'd love to see DScript one day ...

[Chris via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 10:16:33 UTC, ketmar wrote:

>
> you can start with "language report" (i.e. short semi-formal 
> description of language). then people will have at least 
> something to bikeshed. ;-)

I'd say let's start with as few features as possible and 
concentrate on speed (including JIT) and extensibility. With 
extensibility I mean a) the language itself, i.e. it should be 
easy to extend the language without having to redesign the core 
and break everything, and b) easy integration of D and C.

JS will become obsolete when other languages can be compiled to 
webasm, which is the right way to go. I wouldn't put too much 
effort into JS anymore.