Anybody still using the chm docs

[captaindet via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-06-16 00:29, rikki cattermole wrote:
> Honestly? I read the source for Phobos even with a internet connection
> quite often. So having it not included isn't an issue there, but spec is.

real programmers do ...

well, i do sometimes too. but i rather regard myself as an average user, 
while i see you as an advanced developer. ppl like me like easy 
digestible documentation.

i don't want to start a fight here. if it has to go it has to go. just 
making a point that it is useful for some.

maybe a 2nd pdf could be made instead containing the phobos docs?