Fixed date to move to ddox for Phobos documentation

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-06-04 18:10, Seb wrote:
> More than two and half years ago, Sönke added ddox builds for the Phobos
> documentation. We all know that there are many reasons for ddox - being
> able to generate single pages for methods is just one, it also
> eliminates all the JavaScript hacks (e.g. the quickindex menu, anchors,
> ...) that we have added over time to deal with the shortcomings of ddoc.
>
> This post originates from a recent discussion [2] that showed the higher
> ranking of the ddox pages in search engines because of those single
> pages, more static content and meta information.
>
> To quote Adam [3]:
>
>> ddox got a decent go up to here.
>> But then we need to decide what's next - a clear goal, including a due
>> date, gets us all aligned and removes a lot of the uncertainty on the
>> author's side; it is some reassurance that they aren't wasting their
>> time, and encourages outside teams to get onboard.
>
> We got the MREF change into Phobos a month ago and Sönke has fixed the
> last blocking bug with ddox (broken source code links) a couple of days
> ago.

Just found this issue [1], symbols are hyphenated in Safari.

[1] https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox/issues/126

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg