std.experimental.checkedint is ready for comments!

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/15/2016 8:56 PM, tsbockman wrote:
> Pull requests are routinely reviewed in an upside-down fashion:
>
> 1) Formatting
> 2) Typos
> 3) Names
> 4) Tests (and names again)
> 6) Docs (and names)
> 8) Design (and more about names)
> 9) Does this even belong in Phobos?

It's a consequence of starting to read a document cold, i.e. the first thing 
noticed is the formatting, then the typos, then the names, etc.

A deep understanding of the design comes much later, only after having 
thoroughly read it and hit all the speedbumps of typos, etc.