Phobo's migration

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/23/16 8:31 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 08:55:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
>> The DMD developers refuse to use Phobos in the D compiler, so Phobos
>> is obviously not production ready.
>
> Ridiculous. One data point does not make a trend.
>
> Phobos is "obviously" production ready as it's being used in production
> at many companies https://dlang.org/orgs-using-d.html
>
> So companies are willing to build their infrastructure on D because they
> have determined that it's ready for there uses. But we've had a similar
> argument before; IIRC you brought up something about toy languages in
> use in companies.

I don't mean this as disproof, but many companies are not using Phobos, 
even though they use D.

Sociomantic definitely does not (they use D1 currently, and their D2 
port probably uses a port of their library as well), and I believe 
Weka.io does not either.

Again, this isn't proof that Phobos isn't production ready. It depends 
on what you need, and whether Phobos satisfies that need.

-Steve