[OT] ...

Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Jun 24 06:44:14 PDT 2016


On 24.06.2016 08:49, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> >I don't care about any of the limits. ^^ has an essential
>> >discontinuity at (0,0), so the limits don't need to have a bearing on
>> >how you define the value, but if they do, consider that there is only
>> >one direction in which the limit is 0, and an uncountably infinite
>> >number of directions in which the limit is 1.
> Are you sure about this?  I'm pretty sure you can define f(x)^g(x) where
> f(0)=g(0)=0, such that the limit as x->0 can be made to approach any
> number you wish.
>
>

Yes. I was talking about straight lines.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list