GC pathological case behaviour

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 20:12:29 UTC, luminousone wrote:
> Is puts high enough latency that, that main thread can fill the 
> message queue faster then start can exhaust it? If you put a 
> call to sleep for 1ms in the main loop does it have the same 
> result?

It appears that adding a 1ms sleep causes the leak to disappear. 
Still seems like bad behaviour from the GC though, perhaps 
indicative of a bug.