C++17 is feature complete

[Enamex via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 19:27:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 18:50:25 UTC, Enamex wrote:
>> Also, C++17 is 'getting' Modules and Concepts Lite later in 
>> tech specs... that don't even have working drafts according to 
>> this [https://isocpp.org/std/status] (but have experimental 
>> implementations in Clang and VC++, at least).
>
> Modules is not part of C++17, it is on a separate track. 
> Concepts are also not part of C++17.
>
> Maybe it would be a good idea to not complain so much about 
> languages you guys don't know much about.  I suggest focusing 
> on making D better instead.

That's what I said. They're not in the C++17 spec but we won't be 
waiting for C++Next for them, hopefully.

And I complained about nothing; and know little about _any_ 
language; still so much to learn.