Call to Action: making Phobos @safe

[Lodovico Giaretta via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 17:25:31 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 June 2016 at 22:56:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 6/25/2016 3:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> 4. Add @safe to the unittest
>>
>> A unittest that is deliberately unsafe should be annotated 
>> with @system. Meaning that any un-annotated unittest needs 
>> corrective action one way or the other.
>
> What about existing tests that are marked @trusted?
>
> Atila

Maybe I'm missing something, but...
What's the purpose of a @trusted unittest? If it's safe, mark it 
@safe. If it's not, you gain nothing from marking it @trusted, 
given that it will not be called by @safe code (it will not be 
called in general). @trusting a top-level function is useless 
IMHO...