State of the Compiler

[Luis via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 11:22:50 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 10:11:03 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 07:00:43 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
>> wrote:
>>> If phobos isn't stable enough for the compiler, then it isn't 
>>> stable enough for any major project.
>>
>> Not supported by evidence. Unstable ecosystems are 
>> successfully used in major projects as long as they don't have 
>> such circular dependencies.
>
> No circular dependency.
>
> Most _serious_ developers go for mature frameworks and 
> libraries for major projects.

So, for example,  a C++ compiler can't use the standard C++ lib ?