std.database

Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Mar 2 09:26:17 PST 2016


On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 15:41:56 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 21:00:30 UTC, Erik Smith wrote:
>>[...]
>
> My quick comments:
>
> 1. In my opinion it should not be called std.database, but 
> let's say "std.dbc".
> This is because it looks like a wrapper over db clients.  
> Moreover one may say it's almost impossible to make a common 
> and effective interface which would work with all databases. 
> e.g. someone on Wikipedia argues ODBC is obolete (check "ODBC 
> today")
>
> [...]

Looks good.
At least at a first glace it seems pretty similar to SQLite.
I'd like to take this api for sqlite-d.

Because it seems to fit quite naturally.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list