std.database

[Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 21:00:30 UTC, Erik Smith wrote:
> I'm back to actively working on a std.database specification & 
> implementation.  It's still unstable, minimally tested, and 
> there is plenty of work to do, but I wanted to share an update 
> on my progress.

I suggest you call the package stdx.db - it is not (and may not 
become) a standard package, so `std` is out of question. If it is 
supposed to be *proposed* as standard package, then `stdx` is 
good because that is what some people have used in the past 
(while others used the ugly std.experimental. for the same 
purpose).

I humbly believe that this effort **must** be collaborative as 
such package is doomed to fail if done wrong.