Uniform Function Call Syntax?

[Xinok via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 07:45:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> I think it would be better idea to just add the ability to add 
> unicode operators, and to avoid precedence issues one could 
> just require them to use parentheses. That way you could define 
> opCustom"•" and use it as:
>
> ( point1 • point2 )

Please no. If I need to open up Character Map just to write code, 
something has gone horribly wrong.