Uniform Function Call Syntax?

[Wyatt via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 07:45:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
>
> I think it would be better idea to just add the ability to add 
> unicode operators, and to avoid precedence issues one could 
> just require them to use parentheses. That way you could define 
> opCustom"•" and use it as:

I've mentioned this before, but I think a constrained set of 
user-defined operators using annotations/affixes on the existing 
set is a better fit for D.  It's a lesson well-learned from other 
languages (cf. OCaml; F#), and fits with D's generally practical 
bent.

I mean, if you want to alias them to Lucky Charms or various 
hieroglyphs of birds disemboweling men later, I guess maybe 
that's could work? But I really don't want any language features 
predicated on the programmer having an APL keyboard.

-Wyatt