[r/cpp] Why I am not happy with C++17

Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Mar 8 09:31:58 PST 2016


On Tuesday, 8 March 2016 at 15:54:46 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> This more or less means that we (as in D enthusiasts) have some 
> more time to carve up some "market" share. Till C++20 I guess.

Yes, but they got in parallelism ISO/IEC 29124:2010 and file 
system support.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list