Named arguments via struct initialization in functions

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 10 March 2016 at 19:36:05 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
> On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 18:21:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
>> On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 10:40:15 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
>>> Which I don't think will cause ambiguity with delegates:
>>> auto tuple3 = { getInt() }; tuple
>>> auto tuple3 = { getInt(); }; lambda
>>
>> Unfortunately this will not work. There was a tuple proposal 
>> sometime back in 2012 or 2013. I can't remember the exact 
>> reason, but somebody came up with a case where it can be 
>> ambiguous as to whether it's a tuple or a delegate.
>
> Can you find the exact case? I'm really interested in getting 
> proper tuple syntax support and I think that's important to 
> cover all the possible cases before can agree on something and 
> move towards implementing it.

Here's the thread where it's pointed out: 
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.372.1364547485.4724.digitalmars-d@puremagic.com

And here's Kenji's DIP:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP32