Idea: std.build instead of dub and make-like tools

[Piotrek via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 19 March 2016 at 17:57:24 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Even 90% is not enough because it leads to forking 
> functionality for those 10%, greatly diminishing 
> standartization. And build systems are highly opinionated. Some 
> people praise imperative systems like SCons - I find it very 
> hard to reason about compared to declarative ones (even compare 
> to Makefiles). Some like magic deduction of dependencies, some 
> stand hard by making stuff explicit. And list goes on.

I agree. That's why I wa wondering if consensus is possible. For 
me declarative style is also the nicest when aplicable.

>> I started that
>> 
>> Piotrek
>
> Good luck with that anyway :)

Sorry it was unfinished sentence :) I'm rather on recon stage.

Piotrek