year to date pull statistics

[PmLk via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 00:20:56 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
>> On Monday, 21 March 2016 at 21:25:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> But then Dicebot quit working on Phobos, and I got busy, and 
>> things just spiralled out of control again.
>
> On topic, I do notice the queue has gotten rather long...

I've also noticed this, in phobos, 3 weeks ago the count has 
jumped from +/-70PR to +/-90PR.

> It's to the point where I feel kind of guilty about opening new 
> pull requests.

You shouldn't. It's not your fault if the authors let their PR 
sleeping during 6 months without maintaining them. If you look at 
the tail of the queue, 60% of the PR don't even pass anymore.

I mean that people could stop proposing small improvments, small 
bug fixes, etc so that the manpower focuses on the "big" stuff 
but it doesn't mean that the status of the old stuff will change 
suddenly.

(Note well that I only speak about Phobos here).