[OT] Swift removing minor features to piss me off

Enamex via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon May 2 03:41:50 PDT 2016


On Friday, 29 April 2016 at 12:06:40 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> A complication with the delegate way is break/continue/return 
> in the statement block, but I suppose it already works for 
> opApply.

I'm curious: what does this actually lower to when compiling?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list