std.experimental.allocator and @nogc

[Hildigard Sandyman via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 9 May 2016 at 05:00:31 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> On 09/05/2016 4:50 PM, Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> It seems to me, that std.experimental.allocator should work 
>> with @nogc
>> annotated functions if none of the allocators being used are 
>> the
>> gcallocator, though it's not at all clear to me how this would 
>> work.
>>
>> Are there plans for this?
>
> If only we had @assumenogc ala @safe's @trusted but for @nogc 
> we could definitely do it then.

I think you've been misleaded by the initial Q that spuriously 
assumes that allocators are not @nogc but @nogc allocators seems 
to be a milestone that's in our back now.