Always false float comparisons

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/9/2016 6:46 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I know this is a bit band-aid-ish, but if one is comparing literals to a float,
> why not treat the literal as the type being compared against? In other words,
> imply the 1.3f. This isn't integer-land where promotions do not change the outcome.

Because it's yet another special case, and we know where those lead. For 
example, what if the 1.30 was the result of CTFE?