Killing the comma operator

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 10.05.2016 11:52, Mathias Lang wrote:
>
> It seems there is a reasonable ground to kill it. However, there have
> been legitimated concern about code breakage, so we would like to hear
> from other people:
>
> Do you like comma expressions,

It's sometimes a useful thing to do. But every usage of the comma 
operator, e.g. (e1,e2,e3), could just be e.g. (e1,e2,e3)[$-1] instead 
with tuple syntax, and the latter is a lot more explicit.

The two usages that don't conflict with tuple syntax (i.e. as a 
statement/inside a for-loop) could just be left in. They tend not to hurt.

> and think its presence in the language is
> more pro than con ?

No. Kill it.