Always false float comparisons

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/10/2016 12:31 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Think of it like this; a float doesn't represent a precise point (it's
> an approximation by definition), so see the float as representing the
> interval from the absolute value it stores, and that + 1 mantissa bit.
> If you see float's that way, then the natural way to compare them is
> to demote to the lowest common precision, and it wouldn't be
> considered erroneous, or even warning-worthy; just documented
> behaviour.

Floating point behavior is so commonplace, I am wary of inventing new, unusual 
semantics for it.