Is synchronized(...){...} doomed to never be nothrow/@nogc?

[ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 11 May 2016 at 07:01:43 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2016-05-11 03:08, Walter Bright wrote:
>>     [...]
>
> There's code in DWT and Tango as well that throws a 
> SyncException exception when failing to acquire a lock.
>
> [...]

These cases all look like they want to use tryLock instead 
(http://dlang.org/phobos/core_sync_mutex#.Mutex.tryLock).