Supporting musl libc

[Joakim via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 11:30:33 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2016-05-17 11:27, Joakim wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
> It depends. One approach would be to add an option to the 
> druntime makefile, which would add -version CRuntime_Musl when 
> compiling. In that case version(CRuntime_Musl) needs to come 
> before version(CRuntime_Glibc) when declaring the imports. It 
> doesn't sound like a good idea, to depend on the order of the 
> version statements, but it's still a possibility.

I wouldn't take the existence of CRuntime_Glibc as etched in 
stone, but whatever happens, they will not both be defined at the 
same time, so I don't think you should worry about the order.  
You can modify dmd to replace Glibc with Musl for now, and worry 
about how it'll be defined officially later.