DMD producing huge binaries

[Bill Hicks via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 20 May 2016 at 19:41:16 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/20/2016 6:24 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I don't see a need for hashing something. Would a 
>> randomly-generated string
>> suffice?
>
> Hashing produces reproducible unique values. Random will not be 
> reproducible and may not even be unique.

Just a troll here, but Quasirandom numbers are reproducible and 
unique.  e.g., Sobol in base 2 can be very efficient and fast, 
for any output length.