Need a Faster Compressor

Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat May 21 21:35:15 PDT 2016


On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 01:46:23 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
>  I know, if it doesn't fit in 64k then you can't rely on the 
> cache...

  Finished. It's blazing fast and even compresses in my test 
example as good or better than gzip/zlib (although maybe that's 
because it's headerless).

  Now I just need to stress test it against some really large 
input and check for failures. Regardless it has a compression and 
decompression functions, along with benchmarking it vs the 
compression algorithm I'm trying to beat.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list