Need a Faster Compressor
Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat May 21 21:35:15 PDT 2016
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 01:46:23 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
> I know, if it doesn't fit in 64k then you can't rely on the
> cache...
Finished. It's blazing fast and even compresses in my test
example as good or better than gzip/zlib (although maybe that's
because it's headerless).
Now I just need to stress test it against some really large
input and check for failures. Regardless it has a compression and
decompression functions, along with benchmarking it vs the
compression algorithm I'm trying to beat.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list