The Case Against Autodecode

H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri May 27 12:43:16 PDT 2016


On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:30:53PM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 5/27/16 3:10 PM, ag0aep6g wrote:
> > I don't think there is value in distinguishing by language. The
> > point of Unicode is that you shouldn't need to do that.
> 
> It seems code points are kind of useless because they don't really
> mean anything, would that be accurate? -- Andrei

That's what we've been trying to say all along! :-P  They're a kind of
low-level Unicode construct used for building "real" characters, i.e.,
what a layperson would consider to be a "character".


T

-- 
English is useful because it is a mess. Since English is a mess, it maps well onto the problem space, which is also a mess, which we call reality. Similarly, Perl was designed to be a mess, though in the nicest of all possible ways. -- Larry Wall


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list