Our Sister
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat May 28 06:09:40 PDT 2016
On Saturday, 28 May 2016 at 04:15:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
> This is only true for the owner. If we had 'scope', or
> something like
> it (ie, borrowing in rust lingo), then the fat slice wouldn't
> need to
> be passed around
Right, I agree - if we keep the slice just the way it is now, it
all still works if you borrow correctly!
(BTW, I don't think we even need this to be strictly @safe,
though it would be nice if it was tested, we could say @system
getSlice and potentially change it to @safe later.)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list