Our Sister
Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue May 31 05:01:17 PDT 2016
On Friday, 27 May 2016 at 21:25:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 05/27/2016 05:02 PM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
>> With the current state of things, I'll just take your word
>> on it.
>
> Reasoning is simple - yes we could safely convert to
> const(char)[] but that means effectively all refcounting is
> lost for that string. So we can convert but in an explicit
> manner, e.g. str.toGCThisWillCompletelySuckMan. -- Andrei
We could have:
const(char)[] s = rcstr.stealSlice;
Which is null* if the refcount is > 1. rcstr would then be empty
on success. In fact if with the RC DIP we guarantee the memory
doesn't escape, stealSlice could return string.
*Or better, return an Option.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list