CTFE Status

[Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d]

On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:44:20 +0000, Marc Schütz wrote:

> On Tuesday, 1 November 2016 at 17:41:35 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> I intend to keep the current implemntation around as a fallback.
>> For things that are used rarely.
>> like floating point and others :)
> 
> Is that a good idea? It means that there will be tons of really complex
> code that is rarely if ever used and therefore gets no testing...

I think the intent is that the current implementation will always be used 
for specific features, not that the compiler will attempt to run CTFE 
with the bytecode version and resort to the previous implementation if 
something goes wrong.