CTFE Status

[Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 5 November 2016 at 03:01:48 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> On Friday, 4 November 2016 at 10:59:25 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
>> In this case better make sure to remove the resulting dead 
>> code from the old interpreter, otherwise it will become and 
>> unmaintainable mess in the long run.
>
> interpreter is used all over the code, and it is a set of 
> visitors doing various things. that is, it is not possible to 
> remove "dead code" from it, only replace it as a whole.

Yes what ketmar said.

It is looking good, current testsuite-failures are caused by the 
new engines missing checks for ub, and the inability to signal 
those errors.

Figuring out a good mechanism for error-signaling is the next 
challenge.