interest in Static Analysis for D ?

[Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 15:28:14 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> if it will be independent utility -- yes. dmdfe part -- no.

It would relay on the parser of the dmdfe, and parts of dmd's 
semantic analysis.

DMD will be much nicer to work with the facility envision.
As I see it there is little reason for writing yet another D 
parser.