CTFE Status

[Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 20 November 2016 at 15:37:50 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> Furthermore I need to extend my bc_tests. to make sure the 
> interpretation is the same.
> Such that this bug cannot happen again.

I have extended my test-suite to test this case.
It is crucial that the c backend and the interpreter back-ends  
do always return the same correct value. As those are both 
testable at CTFE.

I have plans to implement a small CTFEable 
instruction-set-simulator for the intel 486 processor.
That way I can make sure that my x86-backend does what it is 
supposed to do.
However this is further down the road :)