Mir Random [WIP]

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 11:03:33 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
wrote:
> It is only question of `Random` alias, which can be changed in 
> the future anyway. Both Mt19937_32 and Mt19937_64 are defined.

I think we're at an impasse in terms of priorities, because 
that's exactly the reason that I think you should leave the 
Random alias pointing to the same generator, and let the people 
with speed/quality concerns select the alternative generator ;-)