Mir Random [WIP]

[Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 11:44:44 UTC, Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling wrote:
> Yes, most uses of RNGs in std.random involve calling `front` 
> and then `popFront()` (although it would probably be better the 
> other way round).  But it's readily possible to imagine 
> range-based use-cases for random distributions along the lines 
> of,
>
>     myRNG.normalDistribution(0.0, 5.0).filter!(a => a > 
> 0).somethingElse.take(20);
>
> But what I'd say more broadly is that of what I've seen so far, 
> mir.random is conflating too many breaking changes without 
> giving thought for their impact (for example, converting the 
> `isUniformRNG` check to rely on a UDA is IMO problematic; I can 
> file a GitHub issue explaining the reasons for this).  Allowing 
> for the wider goals of the exercise, it could be worth giving 
> some thought to which of these breakages is really needed to 
> support your use-cases, and which can be avoided.

Added RandomRangeAdaptor for URBGs:
https://github.com/libmir/mir-random/blob/master/source/random/algorithm.d