Mir Random [WIP]

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 14:30:53 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> This claim would apply to all ranges. There seems to be 
> evidence it is unfounded.
>
> The main argument for using the range interface for RNGs is 
> reuse of abstraction. Minute implementation matters are much 
> less important. The main counter-argument is that the 
> abstraction is not fitting well and another abstraction (such 
> as opCall) is more advantageous.

Consider this okayish looking code:
consume(rng());
consume(rng.take(2)); //reuses previous value
consume(rng()); //discards unused value