Mir Random [WIP]
Somebody via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Nov 23 23:37:36 PST 2016
> I have to agree that creating a different API that uses opCall
> or whatever instead of a the range API is a bad idea,
> particularly when a simple helper function would make it
> possible to use a random number generator in a fashion more
> like rand() for the cases where that's preferable, and for a
> lot of cases, having the range API is _extremely_ useful.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
Would, assuming the OpCall() interface, generate!(() => rng())
make an input range out of it easily? Or am I missing something?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list