[OT] Lower and upper median of 4
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Nov 26 14:30:31 PST 2016
On 26.11.2016 23:16, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 26.11.2016 22:36, Timon Gehr wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks! Sorry, I forgot to mention partitioning around the lower/upper
>>> median is also needed. It seems that changes the tradeoff space. --
>>> Andrei
>>
>> Did you see the suggestion to make the leanLeft/leanRight cases
>> symmetric, such that both use at most 4 branches?
>
> Code:
>
> void medianOf(bool leanRight,T)(ref T[4] r, size_t a, size_t b, size_t
> c, size_t d){
> assert(a!=b&&a!=c&&a!=d&&b!=c&&b!=d&&c!=d);
> if(r[c]<r[a]) swap(r[a],r[c]);
> if(r[d]<r[b]) swap(r[b],r[d]);
> if(leanRight?r[d]<r[c]:r[b]<r[a]){
> swap(r[c],r[d]);
> swap(r[a],r[b]);
> }
> if(r[c]<r[b]) swap(r[b],r[c]);
> if(leanRight) assert(r[a]<=r[c]&&r[b]<=r[c]&&r[c]<=r[d]);
> else assert(r[a]<=r[b]&&r[b]<=r[c]&&r[b]<=r[d]);
> }
>
Slightly larger code, but uses fewer swaps:
void medianOf(bool leanRight,T)(ref T[4] r, size_t a, size_t b, size_t
c, size_t d){
assert(a!=b&&a!=c&&a!=d&&b!=c&&b!=d&&c!=d);
if(r[c]<r[a]) swap(r[a],r[c]);
if(r[d]<r[b]) swap(r[b],r[d]);
static if(leanRight){
if(r[d]<r[c]){
swap(r[c],r[d]);
if(r[c]<r[a]) swap(r[a],r[c]);
}else if(r[c]<r[b]) swap(r[b],r[c]);
assert(r[a]<=r[c]&&r[b]<=r[c]&&r[c]<=r[d]);
}else{
if(r[b]<r[a]){
swap(r[a],r[b]);
if(r[d]<r[b]) swap(r[b],r[d]);
}else if(r[c]<r[b]) swap(r[b],r[c]);
assert(r[a]<=r[b]&&r[b]<=r[c]&&r[b]<=r[d]);
}
}
The best strategy is probably to exhaustively enumerate all
Pareto-optimal algorithms and to benchmark them automatically within the
larger algorithm.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list