debugging mixins

Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Oct 3 08:23:40 PDT 2016


On Sunday, 2 October 2016 at 03:36:31 UTC, Manu wrote:
> This comes up a lot.
> As far as I know, it's not solved. What shall we do?
>
> I feel like a simple solution would be to have the compiler 
> emit a <filename>_mixin.d file populated with all the mixin 
> expansions beside the .obj files, and have the debuginfo refer 
> to that fabricated source file?
>
> It might look a little bit weird jumping into code where the 
> surrounding scope is not visible (unless that were copied over 
> too?), but it's better than what we have now.
>
> Are there any other commonly proposed solutions?

Yes, having the mixins expanded without the surrounding code 
would make it difficult to debug in some cases.  Maybe generating 
the entire source with the expanded mixins is another option?

mycode.d
obj/mycode_processed.d

Maybe this idea could also be expanded to template instantiation?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list