color lib

[Manu via Digitalmars-d]

On 8 October 2016 at 23:28, Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 October 2016 at 13:06:42 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>
>> On 7 October 2016 at 18:09, Ethan Watson via Digitalmars-d
>> <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday, 7 October 2016 at 01:57:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regarding 'Linear.No'... yeah... I dunno. I've had this argument before.
>>>> I really hate that pattern. If it's required, I'll do it
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At least as far as readability goes, explicit parameterisation lets you
>>> understand the invocation at a glance rather than already knowing the actual
>>> name of the parameter or having to go elsewhere in code to see the
>>> prototype. For a library, I'd favor readability.
>>
>>
>> Oh no, you too? >_<
>> Incidentally, have you had a geez over the core API? An efficient API
>> will emerge when we work out how to work batched operations into
>> ranges...
>
>
> I like true/false here :-)

I like this guy ;)