Required DMD changes for Mir and few thoughts about D future
Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Oct 8 10:22:36 PDT 2016
On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 09:22:56 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
> On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 22:34:59 UTC, Andrei
> Alexandrescu wrote:
>> That would work out as long as interaction is seamless. Please
>> advise. Overall: I think Ilya's work can make a real
>> difference for D, and we can't afford it to not work with the
>> reference implementation. -- Andrei
Yes agreed, we don't want this to become the reference
implementation.
But just as the OP mentioned I think the cost for a workable dmd
support is fairly high, in terms of missing dmd features and
porting mir to dmd.
Integrating this with a pre-compiled ldc library is a fantastic
idea OTOH.
If we can make this work, it will be much less effort and yield
the fastest implementation. Also would speed up the development
cycle a bit b/c the kernels don't need to be recompiled/optimized.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list