Can you shrink it further?

[Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 11 October 2016 at 14:24:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 03:30 AM, Matthias Bentrup wrote:
>> A branch-free version:
>>
>> void popFront4(ref char[] s) @trusted pure nothrow {
>>   immutable c = s[0];
>>   uint char_length = 1 + (c >= 192) + (c >= 240) + (c >= 248);
>>   s = s.ptr[char_length .. s.length];
>> }
>>
>
> void popFront4(ref char[] s) @trusted pure nothrow {
>   immutable c = s[0];
>   if (c < 0x80) {
>     s = s.ptr[1 .. s.length];
>   } else {
>     uint l = 1 + (c >= 192) + (c >= 240) + (c >= 248);
>     s = s.ptr[l <= s.length ? l : s.length .. s.length];
>   }
> }
>
> This generated 27 instructions, i.e. same as the baseline. See:
>
> http://ldc.acomirei.ru/#compilers:!((compiler:ldc,options:'-release+-O3+-boundscheck%3Doff',sourcez:G4ewlgJgBADiMDEBOIB2AXAjACiQUwDMoBjACwEMkBtAXSgGcBKKAAXSQFd709oYP8UVCHSkUAdygBvAFBQoYALaKO6cgCMANnhJQAvAyoAGGgG45CotmJQAPFCMAPABxHms%2BfPr6GAOhjsVJhQvr5%2B2qgA5qJmFgC%2BUHia9DoenkpwSOgkIPi%2B6mDo8OaeUBxgGAo%2BAOwcUAC0UOr0SNgAfjYAPlCYHIwl6YqZ2dwQvuSakbmFpIoD8mBWYFAAfFAAbH1VBpjzDD70/oGKFdhgADTheFGizKFXN6Sx8nEyrzKgkLDwyGjoAEy4QgkCjUOjcJDMNicbi8WACHTCUQSaQWJQqNRaHQ2AwQ4zPSxQax2BwuNwWNLyAD0VICSAU3i4cKKUHIn2gHFQXLwxDw9HolAAnk0QJyIN4yDyANYVSK%2BCxedgHdhHajBe4Q3wRaJPAaveRJFKE4l6AxOAgERgUhVQGlNFplVAQQgVOEEXIOG0Q5VIVVBEJhTXamJ6iyGvDW0oZXLZYi5PD5QrwKAALntSD25FUICginozRqDXT7WI/RtiyJ2DzBfs/2Y3Sr%2Be8a3WjCtpUpnhpAElUMAJl8AKoAFQQ9WcNvk1e8Oz2%2BsGwwY6DGEymSBmcy9StxKrpVBOqEbzUuQeuOrugZVwd18TeMiAA)),filterAsm:(commentOnly:!t,directives:!t,labels:!t),version:3
>
> But it doesn't seem to check for all errors.
>
>
> Andrei

It's much slower.
Because of the flag-storing instructions.