Can you shrink it further?

Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Oct 13 21:21:28 PDT 2016


On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 17:59:51 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 10/12/2016 01:05 PM, safety0ff wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 16:48:36 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
>>> [Snip]
>>
>> Didn't see the LUT implementation, nvm!
>
> Yah, that's pretty clever. Better yet, I suspect we can reuse 
> the look-up table for front() as well. -- Andrei

The first results from stoke are in.
It turns out stoke likes to produce garbage :(
It's smallest result so far has around 100 instructions.
However it might get better if I give it a few more hours to 
explore.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list