"for" statement issue

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 10/21/16 10:12 AM, Temtaime wrote:
> On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 13:42:49 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 13:33:26 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Eh, that's exactly what the language rules say should happen, and it
>> actually does make sense to me... you might even want to use an
>> immediately-called lambda to group several statements together into
>> one expression.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Please, no.
> It's fully clear that { stmts } createa a lambda, just () is ommited.

No, it's not.

{ int x; x = 2; }

Is not a lambda. It's a scope.

So the meaning changes based on where it's used. I totally agree that we 
should remove that feature.

-Steve