Fallback 'catch-all' template functions

Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Sep 1 02:16:41 PDT 2016


On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 09:08:31 UTC, Manu wrote:
>
> This was my fallback plan, but it seems a bit shit.

Hmm I get your point.
But there is not really another way within the current langauge.
Also overloading lot of templates with templates constraints will 
eat into your compile-time!



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list