ADL

[Manu via Digitalmars-d]

On 3 September 2016 at 11:25, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 9/2/2016 6:12 PM, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>
>> If this feature were supported, it would probably break our module system.
>> Even if we could shoehorn it into the language it would make the compiler
>> slower.
>
>
> Note that C++ needs ADL in part because it cannot do options 2, 3 or 4.

They're not solutions though, they're workarounds. They're all
problematic, and highly unsavoury.
Nobody is gonna go "oh, i really wish i could do those things in
C++!", because the problem is already solved :/